The members of the Academy of
Motion Picture Arts don’t vote like most Americans. That’s not just
because they’re voting for movies instead of politicians. The Academy uses
a different voting system from most American elections to determine
Oscar nominees and winners: ranked choice voting.
The Academy uses ranked choice
voting in multi-seat elections (also known as single transferable vote) to
determine the nominees for most major awards. Any movie that receives more
than a sixth of the vote, for categories with five nominees, will
be nominated. To determine the winner of an award, the Academy uses
single-seat ranked choice voting (also known as instant runoff voting).
The movie that receives the
fewest first choice rankings is eliminated. Ballots are then retabulated,
with each ballot counting as a vote for each voter's highest ranked movie
that has not been eliminated, and the process continues until a winner has been determined.
To illustrate why ranked choice
voting is so important for the Oscars, imagine yourself as a voter in last
year’s Academy Awards. You thought Django was the best movie
of the year, but you also thought the two movies most likely to win were
Argo and Lincoln, and you preferred Argo over Lincoln.
Under a plurality voting system, you would be forced to choose between
voting honestly for Django and potentially wasting your vote,
or strategically voting for Argo so your preference would affect the
outcome.
American voters are regularly
forced to make such decisions at the ballot box. Fortunately, members of
the Academy do not have to choose between honesty and strategy. Under the
ranked choice voting system used to select the Best Picture, you could
rank Django first, Argo second, and Lincoln third.
If Django loses, your vote would default to Argo,
so your preference would still have an impact.
Ranked choice voting makes the
Oscars more fair and competitive. By ranking the movies in order of
preference, voters don’t have to worry about splitting the vote or
a possible “spoiler effect.” A movie with strong support from just a few
voters will not defeat a movie that has a broader base of support among
the entire academy.
Of course, the principles that
make ranked choice voting such a great system for the Oscars apply equally
(if nor more so) to politics. Ranked choice voting was used in 2013 for
municipal or school board elections in Cambridge, Minneapolis, and St. Paul and
at a national level in Australia.
No comments:
Post a Comment